The current study is based on a survey of participants in trial conducted in the late 1990s at MGH and at the Loma Linda University Medical School in California. That study compared the results of two different radiation doses for treatment of early-state prostate cancer.
The current study is based on a survey of
participants in trial conducted in the late 1990s at MGH and at the Loma Linda University Medical
School in California. That study compared the results
of two different radiation doses for treatment of early-state prostate cancer.
All participants received an equal dose of conventional X-ray therapy and a
booster dose of proton therapy that brought the total dose to either the
then-standard level of 70 Gy or to 79 Gy, which is now the usual dosage for
similar tumors. Proton therapy reduces the amount of radiation delivered to
normal tissues in front of and behind a tumor, and the X-ray therapy was also
given in a way to minimize the irradiation of normal tissues.
The earlier study showed that, five years after
treatment, the higher radiation dose had reduced tumor recurrence by about
half, a benefit that persisted up to nine years after treatment. Participants'
physicians reported similarly low rates of treatment-related toxicity in both
groups, but the patients themselves had not been asked about their
post-treatment experiences.
The current investigation was designed to study
participants' reports of their experiences, considered to be the most accurate
measure of side effects. The researchers sent all surviving participants a
questionnaire that included standardized assessments of the urinary, bowel and
sexual symptoms usually affected by prostate cancer treatment. Separate from
the specific symptom assessment, participants were asked to rank their function
in those areas as normal, intermediate or poor. They also were surveyed about
their attitudes regarding their current health, their cancer and the treatment
decisions they had made.
Survey questionnaires were returned by 280 of the
original 398 study participants, evenly divided between the standard- and
high-dose groups. Both groups reported similarly low levels of treatment side
effects and quality of life problems. Patients in the standard-dose group – who
had greater incidence of tumor recurrence, often requiring additional therapies
– expressed less confidence that their tumors were under control and more
regret about their treatment choice, which in this case was to enroll in the
randomized trial. Participants' overall ranking of the urinary, bowel and
sexual functions was often better that would be expected based on the symptoms
they reported.
Jack Szostak is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes
Medical School,
Professor of Genetics at Harvard <a href= http://www.medicalschool.org/>Medical School</a>,
and the Alex Rich Distinguished Investigator in the Department of Molecular
Biology at the Massachusetts
General Hospital.
He received the 2009 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of the enzyme
telomerase, which protects chromosomes from degrading, a process common to
aging and various disease states. He received the 2006 Lasker Award for Basic
Medical Research for the same work.
His current research interests are in the
laboratory synthesis of self-replicating systems and the origin of life. He and
his colleagues have developed in vitro selection as a tool for the isolation of
rare functional RNA, DNA, and protein molecules from large pools of random
sequences. His laboratory has used in vitro selection and directed evolution to
isolate and characterize numerous nucleic acid sequences with specific ligand
binding and catalytic properties. He is co-director of Harvard’s Origins of
Life Initiative.
Szostak has also been awarded, along with Gerald
Joyce of The Scripps Research Institute, the 1994 National Academy of Sciences
Award in Molecular Biology and the 1997 Sigrist Prize from the University of
Bern, Switzerland. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and a
Fellow of the New York Academy of Sciences and the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences. In 2000, Szostak was awarded the Medal of the Genetics
Society of America.
Brian Paegel is an assistant professor in the
Department of Chemistry with a joint appointment to the Translational Research
Institute at Scripps Florida, part of The Scripps Research Institute, which is
headquartered in La Jolla, California. He is well known for his work in the
field of directed evolution, applying Darwinian principles to populations of
molecules rather than organisms and using microfluidic technology as a platform
for observing evolution in real time in molecules research in <a href= http://www.medicalschool.org/>medical school</a>.
Paegel graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. in
chemistry from Duke University (NC) in 1998 and received his Ph.D. in chemistry
from the University of California, Berkeley
in December 2003. Just prior to joining Scripps Florida
in 2008, he was a National Institutes of Health postdoctoral fellow in Gerald
Joyce’s laboratory at Scripps Research’s La Jolla
campus. He received a National Institutes of Health Pathway to Independence
Award in 2007.
| Additional articles about medical school |
|
|
| About the author |
Author Bio:-
Ram Sagar is an eminent analyst and writer in medical school related topics. He has authored many books on school guide for Find more package at http://www.medicalschool.org/ |
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0