The law of demand explains why the demand curve is negatively sloped, this law states that demand for a good declines as price rises and increases as prices decline. This law however applies to normal goods given that there are other types of goods that do not obey this law, example inferior and Veblen goods.
Utility and demand:
The law of demand explains why the demand curve is negatively
sloped, this law states that demand for a good declines as price rises and
increases as prices decline. This law however applies to normal goods given
that there are other types of goods that do not obey this law, example inferior
and Veblen goods. For inferior goods as the income of consumers increase their
demand declines, for example as the income increases for an individual who owns
a bicycle he may decide to buy a car rather than buy another bicycle. Veblen
goods also violate this law and they are those goods whose demand increases as
their prices go up example luxurious products.
According to neoclassical economists one of the reasons why demand
curve is negatively sloped is due to the substitution effect, this refers to a
situation where good Z is a close substitute of good T, as the price of good T
increases then consumers will purchase good Z which is relatively cheap. For
this reason the demand curve for a good will be negatively shaped showing that
when the price of a product increases then the demand falls as consumer switch
to substitute that are cheaper.
Income effect also explains the negatively sloped demand curve, the
quantity of goods demanded by a consumer will depend on the level of income, a
consumer with higher income levels will demand more goods, however the quantity
of goods that a consumer will buy is limited by the price of that good, for
example a consumer whose income is 1000 and the price of a good is 20 then the
maximum quantity of that good the consumer can buy is 50. If the price of the
good was increased from 20 to 50 then the maximum quantity of that good that
the consumer will buy will be 20. Therefore as the price of a good increases
then the consumer experiences a decline in his or her real income, real income
being the quantity of goods the consumer can purchase.
Consumers demand for a good will also depend on the utility they
gain from that good, when the utility gained from consuming a unit of a good is
high then consumers will demand more of that good, according to the utility
theory rational consumers aim at maximising utility by consuming more units,
however the consumers will consume more and more units of that good until the
marginal utility level is zero. For this reason therefore this explains why
from our above example where the additional utility gained after consuming the
second glass of water is greater than after consuming the fourth glass of
water, marginal utility continues to decline until the value is zero and at
this point the consumer cannot consume more of that good.
Optimal consumption levels by a consumer who consumes two goods is
determined using the budget line and indifference curves, indifference curves
is a line drawn that depicts combination of two goods that yield the same
utility level, the optimal consumption level is the point where the budget line
touches the indifference curves. The indifference curve is convex to the origin
depicting diminishing marginal utility, marginal utility refers to the increase
in level of utility as the consumption of a good increase by one unit.
Marginal utility concept is based on a number of assumptions, and
one is that utility is quantifiable, and utility of one commodity does not
influence the utility of another commodity, also that marginal utility of money
remains constant. Walsh and Stiglitz interpret marginal utility as the
willingness to pay, this is based on the
assumption that utility is quantifiable and consumers are willing to purchase
more units of a good if marginal utility is greater than zero.
According to this theory the additional utility gained declines as
more and more units of a good is consumed increase. This explains the shape of
the indifference curves which are show below:
The diagram shows indifference curves an individual faces, the
assumptions are that the there are only two goods and that the customer aims at
maximising utility, ID2(indifference curve 2) indicates higher utility levels than
ID1 (indifference curve 1) therefore consumers will prefer ID2, however the
budget line determine the optimal level of consumption, the budget line is
affected by both the price of the two goods and also the income level of the
consumer, budget line 2 indicate a case where the income is higher than for a
consumer facing a budget constrain line 1. If a consumer faces a budget line 1
and the price of both goods decline then he shifts to budget line 2, and consumption
increases for both goods. Assumptions of diminishing marginal utility are that
consumers are rational, this means that the consumers will tend to maximise
their utility by consuming more goods.
Earlier studies on consumer behaviour such as Karl Marx also
introduced the concept of utility and characteristics of goods. According to
Marx a good has four characteristics whereby the good has a price, a use value,
an exchange value and a value. According to him the value of a good is the
amount of labour hours required to produce that product, also that the utility
of a product makes its use value and is only realized when a product is
consumed or used. The exchange value on the other and is the quantity of other
products that the good will exchange for, Marx therefore considered consumer
behaviour as a social process where the price of a good depended on the amount
of labour hours, he stated that the demand of a product will greatly depend ion
its use value but he failed to quantify the use value and therefore the use
value only indicated general utility.
According to Marx the use value or utility of a product depend on
the characteristics of that product, the utility value would therefore be
determined by the labour hours consumed, however neoclassical economists state
that the utility of a product is determined by the buyer, and that the level of
demand of a product by a consumer will therefore highly depend on the changes
in utility gained which is marginal utility. For this reason therefore the
major difference between the use and exchange value of a product and the
marginal utility theory is that who determines utility in the market and also
the changes that occur in utility gained as quantity of a good consumed
increase.
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0