A Wolf had been prowling around a flock of Sheep for a long time,
and the Shepherd watched very anxiously to prevent him from
carrying off a Lamb. But the Wolf did not try to do any harm.
Effective Delegation of Work
A Wolf had been prowling around a flock of Sheep for a long time,
and the Shepherd watched very anxiously to prevent him from
carrying off a Lamb. But the Wolf did not try to do any harm.
Instead he seemed to be helping the Shepherd take care of the
Sheep. At last the Shepherd got so used to seeing the Wolf about
that he forgot how wicked he could be.
One day he even went so far as to leave his flock in the Wolf's care
while he went on an errand. But when he came back and saw how
many of the flock had been killed and carried off, he knew how
foolish to trust a Wolf as he exclaimed. “I have been rightly
served; why did I trust my sheep to a Wolf?”
Moral:
Delegate your task wisely, and only to people you trust.
Lessons in life:
Companies have risen and fallen because they have entrusted
the wrong CEOs and successors with the management duties.
Many great family businesses had been ruined at the hands of
the children or grandchildren who took over the helm, based
on who they were rather than what they could do. When
businesses failed, CEOs rightfully took the brunt. The people
responsible for delegating the management duties should not
be spared either.
A proper delegation should be viewed as a sharing of
responsibility, and not a passing of the baton. When a leader
assigns tasks to the other team members, it remains his
responsibility to monitor and ensure that the members
complete the assigned tasks. Along the way, when the members
face difficulties and hurdles, the leader should step in to assist
and advise. Of course, for any delegation to be effective, the
leader must empower the members and confer on them a certain
amount of authority and resources necessary for the tasks at
hand. What we are saying is that the leader cannot assign all his
functions, powers and authority, and still expect to be called a
leader. He would be a consultant and not the person-in-charge.
A skillful delegation should therefore lead to a happy solution
for everyone. The CEO has time to look at the overall direction
of growth, strategic plans and policies of the company, while
retaining the top spot and top salary. The deputy CEOs and
departmental chiefs have the necessary powers and authority
to run the show, and make decisions within their portfolio. The
middle managers, supervisors and heads take charge of the day-
to-day operational activities, and are empowered to make
decisions within their scope of work.
Since delegating work plays such an important role for successful
CEOs, why are most of them not doing it, or not doing enough?
Why do we see CEOs attending to routine low-level tasks and
even chairing meetings on totally operational matters? There are
various reasons why we - CEOs, leaders and managers - avoid
delegating our tasks and responsibility. Here are some reasons
and the ways to get around them:-
1. Do not trust employees with the responsibility.
Even the most skillful manager will have this nagging feeling
that the person tasked with the job cannot carry it out in the
way he wants. Maybe the manager is a perfectionist. If so, the
problem lies with the manager having expectations that are too
high and onerous. It could also be that the manager does not
have a habit of giving clear instructions on what the task entails.
Although managers should not have to resort to holding the
staff's hands in every matter, it is always advisable to clearly
define the tasks and leave no room for doubt. Ultimately, the
questions that we should ask ourselves are these – If we do not
trust the staff, why do we employ them in the first place? If they
don't have the skill, why don't we send them for further training?
2. Only we know best.
While it is true that experience is what earn the managers their
position, nobody can claim to be a walking encyclopedia on all
matters. The workers doing the factory-line, front desk jobs day
in and day out, are the only people who know the work and the
problems faced at the back of their hands.
3. Work faster on our own.
If we have done a piece of work before, we can do it again faster
and better. We can continue taking on the same assignment and
after the hundredth time, we may complete it twice as fast.
Think then, if we train another person to do it, will that person
not be able to arrive at the same achievement over time? We
are freeing up more of our time to do other work and duties,
and on the whole, complete all our work in a much shorter time.
4. We lose our control.
How much control do we want? Are we really concerned about
the process or the outcome? We can work with the employee to
come up with a mutually agreeable process, but it is the outcome
that we are targeting. By assigning the job, we risk losing control
over the little bits of how the job is done although we can
continue to maintain control over the important aspects of the
job by spelling out the expected output and performance targets
as well as quality control checks and standards.
5. We lose our authority.
This again depends on how you view the word “authority”. We
may not have direct supervision over groups of employees. They
will report to their immediate supervisors. However, these
supervisors are now under our charge, and our authority is in
effect extended. It is akin to changing our authority from a
parent to a grand-parent. In a typical family structure, the grand-
parent status is the most revered and respected.
| Additional articles about story |
|
|
| About the author |
|
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0