A study by the Rand Corporation found that while having electronic medical records could improve care, the transition may be difficult for some patients. When systems were complex or newly adopted, the quality of care decreased.
Slowly but at a pace consistent with such changes, the medical profession is going to
high
tech health data bases. Regardless your medical background, where you
resided at the time, your records are available to those who may need
to treat you again. But doctor’s say all lis not well with the system.
The
Rand Corporation researchers conducted a cohort study using data on
hospital electronic health record (EHR) systems from 2003 and 2005, as
well as publicly reported hospital quality data from 2004 and 2007.
When a basic EHR system was available, they found a 2.6 percent
improvement in the quality of care with patients with heart failure,
but hospitals trying to adopt advanced EHR systems saw a one percent
drop in quality for acute heart attack and a three percent decrease in
care for heart failure patients.
Hospitals that were in the
process of upgrading its EHR systems to more advanced ones, saw a 1.2
percent decrease in the quality of care for heart attack patients, and
a 2.8 percent decrease in quality of care in heart failure patients.
Researchers
found that hospitals that already had EHR systems in place appeared to
perform better which could account for some of the findings. However,
the researchers noted that measuring the success of such systems was
problematic, and that better means of assessing how well the systems
were performing needs to be developed.
EHR systems are comprised
of patient electronic medical records. These records include: patient
demographics, patient medical history, patient medications and
allergies, and laboratory test results. Nurses and physicians can view
any radiology images and vital signs that might be associated with a
particular patient, also.
Approximately, savings of using EHR
systems as opposed to standard, paper systems could be $23 billion per
year for Medicare and #31 billion per year for private insurance
companies. Electronic medical records could also help promote
evidence-based medicine and increase record keeping and mobility. Some
aspects of quality of care could be improved, as well. Using EHR
systems could reduce medical errors.
However, EHR systems are very pricey; Systems cost between $550 and $6,000 per physician.
However, one of the reasons Americans pay so much for health care is because of the high
administrative
costs associated with using standard, paper systems, so switching to
EHR systems could save money in the long-run. Learning the new system
can be time-consuming; many physicians feel that adopting a new EHR
system actually reduces clinical productivity.
The
Personal Injury Lawyer Raleigh NC law firm of HENSONFUERST one of the southeast’s.
| Additional articles about Personal Injury Lawyer Raleigh NC |
|
|
| About the author |
Thousands of victims in North Carolina and throughout the southeast United States have
made the North Carolina Medical Malpractice Attorneys firm of HENSONFUERST their resource of choice when battling for victim’s rights in medical malpractice resulting in personal or wrongful death. HensonFuerst demands nothing less than the highest standard of fair and ethical treatment for all of our clients. |
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0