According to statistics released by the Chinese Ministry of Civil
Affairs, divorces in the Middle Kingdom climbed a whopping 10.3% in
2009 over 2008. Statistics for 2010 have yet to be released.
According to experts, the driving force behind the alarming increase is one word: selfishness.
They claim that children born after China’s 1979 family planning
policy, which limited families to a single child, are now obsessed with
themselves as they go into marriage. They lack the maturity and sharing
skills that earlier generations, who grew up with siblings, were
obligated to learn and experience.
"The reason the divorce rate is high among post-80s couples is mainly
that they value their own interests and rarely care about other
people's feelings," Sun Yunxiao, deputy director of the China Youth and
Children Research Center told The Straits Times. "They are officially
China's first 'Me Generation'."
While there is no separate statistic highlighting how many of China’s
1.71 million couples who filed for divorce are part of this post-80
phenomenon, Yunxiao’s organization claims that they represent about 30%
of all divorces – or about 500 thousand.
However, despite the stress and trauma of divorce, there may be a
positive ending to at least some of the divorce stories, because
they’re triggering personal growth and maturity; perhaps filling in
some emotional learning gaps.
"
Divorce is not one party's failure. It is the failure of both parties," stated a 31-year old Chinese
divorcee who spoke to the Straits Times on condition of anonymity. “I cherish the good parts and have learned from the bad ones."
Whether this learning translates into successful second marriages is something to be seen. Hopefully, it does.
| Additional articles about divorce |
|
|
| About the author |
Josh D. Simon is the staff writer of Divorce Magazine and www.DivorceMagazine.com which offers information on Divorce Law and divorce, divorce lawyer, divorce attorney, divorce law, divorce information , divorce advice, Divorce Insurance |
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0