 |
Articles Area
Home Login / Register Browse Articles Search Articles Submit an Article Get RSS Feeds Add Free Article Content Most Viewed Latest Articles Article RatingsGuidelines
Authors PublishersPartners
ArticlesAreaDo You Have Doubts About Homosexuality?
Submitted by marco on Monday Dec 04, 2006 and viewed 628 timesTotal Word Count: 437
Author Rating: NA
Rate this article
|
Publisher
|
Print
Homosexuality has been present since day one. From that cave in Central Africa to the luxurious penthouse in New York City.
Recent articles on Homosexuality have raised a few shackles, or whatever. The topic is complex with or without the imposition of either biological or religious criteria.
A visit to the British Museum and a few hours poring over some incredibly enlightening tomes would do wonders to e my readers and fans, all six of them. Soon as I get the second part of my tax refund, thanks to all of you, I shall charter a flight to London where my readers, all six of them, are invited to spend a day or two at the BM, all expenses paid.
About the tomes.The study of Sexuality in the primitive social enclaves, or cave men and cave women, reveals an interesting parallel between the need for sexual activity and a similar need for food.
The analysis is of course highly theoretical since some of the elements on which the study is based result from the interpretation of legends and myths of places in Central Africa and later on in Sumeria, now Iraq.
Briefly, if you are hungry you look for food. If your sexual desire is somehow stimulated, you seek a partner. The claim is that both instincts have not changed since that day in the cave when Orgh, after eating half a deer, turned to Erghina and upon observing how she combed her hair, signaled in no uncertain terms that the moment of carnal ecstasy was at hand.
The authors go a bit further. If Erghina was not around but Blorgho, the handsome hunter was and felt the same urge, it was considered a natural act if they satisfied their urges with each other. The rationalization took advantage of the comparisons with food. If you were hungry and there was no deer, you ate roots, or fish or candied apples. Conclusion: the urges had to be satisfied and the fashion adopted was not considered important. Homosexuality was present then.
This is of course an oversimplification. In another volume, much is said about the emergence of organized religions and the effect they had on sexual activity. As morality acquired its own personality, sexual mores were quickly incorporated (mainly adultery) even though homosexuality continued to be tacitly accepted.
By then I was tired of reading so I concluded that neither religion, nor morality, nor biology, nor social guidelines have any business with this human preference.
I looked across the polished library table and saw a lovely lady who, upon observing what I was reading, smiled seductively. After making sure that she was born and raised a female of the species, I smiled, got up off my chair and approached her.
A visit to the British Museum and a few hours poring over some incredibly enlightening tomes would do wonders to e my readers and fans, all six of them. Soon as I get the second part of my tax refund, thanks to all of you, I shall charter a flight to London where my readers, all six of them, are invited to spend a day or two at the BM, all expenses paid.
About the tomes.The study of Sexuality in the primitive social enclaves, or cave men and cave women, reveals an interesting parallel between the need for sexual activity and a similar need for food.
The analysis is of course highly theoretical since some of the elements on which the study is based result from the interpretation of legends and myths of places in Central Africa and later on in Sumeria, now Iraq.
Briefly, if you are hungry you look for food. If your sexual desire is somehow stimulated, you seek a partner. The claim is that both instincts have not changed since that day in the cave when Orgh, after eating half a deer, turned to Erghina and upon observing how she combed her hair, signaled in no uncertain terms that the moment of carnal ecstasy was at hand.
The authors go a bit further. If Erghina was not around but Blorgho, the handsome hunter was and felt the same urge, it was considered a natural act if they satisfied their urges with each other. The rationalization took advantage of the comparisons with food. If you were hungry and there was no deer, you ate roots, or fish or candied apples. Conclusion: the urges had to be satisfied and the fashion adopted was not considered important. Homosexuality was present then.
This is of course an oversimplification. In another volume, much is said about the emergence of organized religions and the effect they had on sexual activity. As morality acquired its own personality, sexual mores were quickly incorporated (mainly adultery) even though homosexuality continued to be tacitly accepted.
By then I was tired of reading so I concluded that neither religion, nor morality, nor biology, nor social guidelines have any business with this human preference.
I looked across the polished library table and saw a lovely lady who, upon observing what I was reading, smiled seductively. After making sure that she was born and raised a female of the species, I smiled, got up off my chair and approached her.
ArticleSource: ArticlesAlley.com
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0
Rating: 0