This article examines the importance of pharmaceutical formulation on the quality of a film coated tablet.
proportion of the tablets
produced around the world are film coated. Coating is applied for a variety of
reasons such as aesthetic appearance; identification and branding; taste or
odor masking; enhanced mechanical strength; and protection from moisture, light
and/or air.
With the current awareness of
health, safety and environmental problems, aqueous film coating is a process
that is routinely employed in the preparation of pharmaceutical solid dosage
forms. The success of this process is determined by three factors: formulation
of the coating system, coating process parameters and tablet core. During the
last 20 years, there has been significant research into coating formulations
and processes. In focusing on these areas, less attention has been paid to
issues that relate to the preparation of a suitable tablet or substrate. This
article will highlight the importance of pharmaceutical formulation on
the quality of a film coated tablet.
Tablet Formulation
The formulation of a robust
tablet has to be considered in terms of:
- The ability of the core to withstand the
mechanical stress of the process.
- Maximized adhesion of the coating to the tablet
surface, especially when a logo is present.
- A smooth film coat with uniform thickness.
- The stability of the final coated dosage form on
storage.
Tablet Mechanical Strength and Friability
The tablets being coated and
the applied coating are constantly subjected to mechanical stress. Tablet breakage
and surface erosion are typically seen when the mechanical strength and
friability of the tablet core are inadequate. The problem can worsen during
scale-up because of the increased weight of the tablets charged into the
coating pan. This situation may occur after product approval, because the use
of ever-increasing pan sizes is not uncommon as product sales increase.
Therefore, any product that is performing poorly with respect to mechanical
strength should not even be exposed to the scale-up process.
It is extremely difficult to
create generalized guidelines defining the physical attributes of a robust
tablet that is acceptable for use in a coating process because so much depends
on the materials that are being used. Tablets with relatively low breaking
force values should be dealt with much more carefully if they are to be coated,
particularly during scale-up. Large tablets, such as multivitamin cores, may
need to have greater mechanical strength values compared with smaller tablets.
A measure of equal or perhaps
greater importance in terms of tablet robustness is friability. This test more
accurately reflects the stresses that tablets will encounter when tumbling into
a coating pan. Tablets to be film coated should have a maximum friability value
of 0.3% and preferably less then 0.1%. This guideline should be adhered to
regardless of tablet size or shape.
Drug and excipient particle
characteristics can also have a significant affect on the success of film
coating. Variations in coating thickness may present a serious problem when the
properties of the film are dependent on its thinnest part, particularly in the
case of modified drug release coatings.
Adhesion of Film Coating to the Tablet Core
Good adhesion between a
polymeric film and a tablet is a fundamental requirement to guarantee a good
bond between the coating and surface of the core as the tablets tumble in the
coating pan, and to maintain the clarity of logos. For the formation of an
adequate and adhesive film coat, the atomized droplets have to spread
completely over the surface of the core – and to a certain degree penetrate
into a substrate. Some of the materials used in tablet formations, however, may
interfere with the intermolecular bonding at the film-substrate interface and hinder
adhesion of the film to the core.
Lubricants are added to
tablet formulations to minimize both die-wall friction and punch adhesion. Both
of these requirements necessitate that the lubricants function at the tablet
surface, precisely where they are counterproductive in the adhesion process
considering the inherent hydrophobicity of lubricants, such as metal stearates.
No excipient used in such
small quantities can have as detrimental effect on tablet quality than
magnesium stearate. Magnesium stearate, although a very effective lubricant,
can reduce the mechanical strength of the cores, decrease film adhesion and
slow drug dissolution. Therefore, the quantity of magnesium stearate used in a
tablet formulation should be minimized. Self-lubricating products such as
Starch 1500 can also be used to reduce the need for significant lubricant
addition.
Conclusion
Many of the ingredients
chosen in initial tablet formulation development can have a significant impact
on aqueous film coating quality. They may affect the physical, mechanical,
adhesive, drug-release and stability properties of the coated dosage form.
Decisions as to the ultimate
appearance of the tablet are often left until later stages of development and
can impact coating quality. To ensure success in the film coating process,
formulation along with the design of the tablet should be considered early in
the development.
About the Authors
Marina Levina is the global
technical manager, MR applications at Colorcon Ltd., UK. Charles R. Cunningham is the
pharmaceutical technical services manager, at Colorcon, USA.
About Colorcon®
Colorcon® is a world leader
in the development, supply and technical support of formulated coatings and
excipients for the pharmaceutical industry. With Colorcon as their pharmaceutical product development partner,
companies produce cost effective, high quality products with superior
performance and appearance. To learn more, please visit http://www.colorcon.com/.
| About the author |
Marina Levina is the global technical manager, MR applications at Colorcon Ltd., UK. Charles R. Cunningham is the pharmaceutical technical services manager, at Colorcon, USA. |
| Additional articles about pharmacuetical product development |
|
|
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0