Motorcycle Lawyers Discuss the Legal Challenges of Bikers of Lesser Tolerance as it Brings Civil Disobedience and Constitutional Court Challenge to North Carolina.
Motorcycle Lawyers Discuss the Legal Challenges of Bikers of Lesser
Tolerance as it Brings Civil Disobedience and Constitutional Court
Challenge to North Carolina
By Ray Henke, a motorcycle accident lawyer and member of Bikers of Lesser Tolerance, California
Freedom fighters joined to form BOLT of North Carolina and are
currently bringing nonviolent civil disobedience and constitutional
court challenge to the streets and courts of the state in response to
the enactment of North Carolina's new helmet law.
The North Carolina helmet law, which went into effect on January 1,
2008, is the same law that NTSB is recommending to state legislatures
nationwide, with the insurance industry and medical lobbies throwing
their weight behind the NTSB recommendations. The law requires
motorcyclists to wear helmets compliant with the federal motorcycle
safety helmet standards set forth at FMVSS 218. The North Carolina law,
and all other state laws requiring riders to ride with helmets that
meet FMVSS 218 plainly are incapable of being understood by the
ordinarily intelligent person, and are certainly incapable of being
applied, except incompetently, subjectively, arbitrarily, and
discriminatory by law enforcement officers. FMVSS 218 is just a list of
laboratory procedures and arbitrary impact criteria. You have to be an
engineer to understand it, and you have to have the laboratory
equipment to apply it. Such laws are unconstitutional because the due
process clause of the United States Constitution requires that law be
comprehensible specifically so that the citizenry can know what is
prohibited, and to avoid arbitrary and discriminatory application of
the law by police and the judiciary. You are invited to learn more
about
the motorcycle lawyers perspective on the Constitutional defects in helmet laws.
The BOLT of North Carolina freedom fighters refuse to be constrained by
this unconstitutionally vague legislation. They are holding
protestrallies all over the state with a frequency and drawing numbers
of bikers refusing to abide the law that has not been witnessed
anywhere in the United States in decades. They have sponsored already
over a dozen helmet protest rides, in which the riders make their own
choices whether to wear helmets. And if they ride with helmets, they
make their own choices as to the kinds of headgear they wear,
undeterred by North Carolina's attempt to force them to wear the riding
hat specified by this new state biker dress code. The BOLT of North
Carolina riders have been joined in their protest by individual bikers
numbering over 500, angered by the state's intrusion upon their
freedom, coming from all over North Carolina. According to the Director
of BOLT of North Carolina, Janice MacKay, "The next acts of civil
disobedience in North Carolina are the 2nd Annual East Coast Helmet
Protest on May 18th, followed by the Maggie Valley Freedom Ride on NC
Bikers Freedom Ride Day, June 12th, and the WNC Freedom Ride in
Asheville from Buncombe's County to Henderson County on June 21st."
It is expected that BOLT of North Carolina will also hold a freedom
ride "in solidarity" with BOLT of California, and ABATE of California,
organized by BOLT member, Red Barron. Two years ago the San Diego
police laid in wait for the participants, setting up roadblocks and
issuing helmet tickets. This past year, the police stayed their
distance. Similarly in North Carolina, notwithstanding the threats of
law enforcement to strictly enforce the new helmet law, Ms. McKay
reports that it is difficult to obtain a helmet ticket without riding
back and forth outside the state police headquarters in Raleigh.
If North Carolina will rise to the challenge to enforce the law, BOLT
of North Carolina hopes to clog the traffic courts at an average cost
to the state of $872 per helmet citation trial, also requiring the law
enforcement officers to appear and explain upon what incompetent basis
they issued the tickets, providing the evidentiary basis for the
initial constitutional challenge that the FMVSS 218 based law cannot be
understood by the biker or cop and therefore is unconstitutionally
vague.
At the same time, BOLT of the North Carolina is active in the
legislature, with a no compromise helmet law repeal bill recently
drafted and distributed to all North Carolina legislators by Jan
MacKay. BOLT is also actively opposing the Street Gang Act and other
legislation often employed by law enforcement arbitrarily and
discriminatory against bikers who chose to wear colors.
This article is provided by Ray Henke, a
California lawyer, founder of Motorcyclists Against Dumb Drivers, and co-moderator of Bruce & Ray's Biker Forum, also a member of Bikers of Lesser Tolerance, and contributor to Biker, Born to Ride and Thunder Road magazines.
| Additional articles about The motorcycle lawyers |
|
|
| About the author |
By Ray Henke, a motorcycle accident lawyer and member of Bikers of Lesser Tolerance, California |
| Please Rate This Article |
Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0