Clicky

Articlesalley.com - Articles Directory

Browse Articles | Submit an Article | Search Articles | Most Viewed Articles | Latest Articles | FAQ
Article Directory
Articles Area
Home Login / Register Get RSS Feeds Add Free Article Content Article Ratings Go Daddy Coupon Codes
Guidelines
Authors Publishers
Home | Legal | Regulatory Compliance | California divorce c ...

California divorce case may change rules on financial discovery

Submitted by Jeffrey and viewed 802 times
Total Word Count: 344  
Author Rating: NA

Rate this article Rate this article | Publisher Publisher | Print Print
CALIFORNIA -- A 2007 appellate divorce case has brought recent light to the subject of full financial disclosure in California divorces.
CALIFORNIA -- A 2007 appellate divorce case has brought recent light to the subject of full financial disclosure in California divorce law.
In In re Marriage of Feldman, a businessman did not disclose certain assets and financial transactions to his wife, although she repeatedly requested the information. Among the information Feldman wouldn't reveal was the formation of several new companies. Mrs. Feldman had learned about her husband's undisclosed assets before the divorce trial and provided her own investigation into the discovery.

Feldman claimed that his lack of disclosure was not intentional and that the secret assets were of small value compared to the whole of the estate. However, the California Court of Appeals rejected these arguments, stating that a divorcing spouse has a duty to disclose everything, which is mandatory until all assets are divided, and that such refusal to do so is not acceptable. According to the Court, Feldman was obliged to disclose all material information in writing, continue to supplement the discovery, and disclose material info before any new project began.

In the end, even though the hidden assets and transactions had not economically damaged Mrs. Feldman in any way, the trial court decided that Feldman should pay his wife $250,000 in sanctions for his failure to comply with the requested disclosure -- as well as another $140,000 in her attorney fees. The court ordered the sanctions under the sections of the TX Family Law Code related to fiduciary duty.

The moral seems to be that hiding important financial information from your spouse is never a good idea. The consequences of doing so, such as the results of the Feldman case, could be far more costly than simply agreeing to a fair property division.

Jeffrey Cottrill attorney handle all the cases in California, California divorce lawyers, California divorce law, California family law, Texas divorce lawyers, California family lawyer, Texas family law

ArticleSource: ArticlesAlley.com
Additional articles about CALIFORNIA -- A 2007 appellate divorce case has brought recent light to the subject of full financial disclosure in California divorces.
About the author
Jeff Cotrill is the staff writer of Divorce Magazine and www.DivorceMagazine.com which offers information on California divorce lawyers,California divorce law, Texas family law and Texas family lawyers
Please Rate This Article

Number of ratings: 0
Rating: 0

© Copyright dd ArticlesAlley.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide. About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | Exchange Links | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use