How many hours must a golfer put in on the course before he can become professional? Though there is no right answer there is certainly opposing arguments on the issue. Some golfers are true believers that you must have some sort of "natural talent" to have any chance of becoming an "expert". If becoming an expert means joining the PGA Tour than it is believed that a very minute percentage of us will actually make it, no matter many hours it is. This side of the issue believes that while most PGA pros have spent the better part of their lives playing golf, they still possess an underlying talent that separates them from the rest of the pack.
How many
hours must a golfer put in on the course before he can become professional?
Though there is no right answer there is certainly opposing arguments on the
issue. Some golfers are true believers that you must have some sort of
"natural talent" to have any chance of becoming an
"expert". If becoming an expert means joining the PGA Tour than it is believed that a very
minute percentage of us will actually make it, no matter many hours it is. This
side of the issue believes that while most PGA pros have spent the
better part of their lives playing golf, they still possess an underlying
talent that separates them from the rest of the pack.
For every guy on tour there are probably 50
guys that did the same thing growing up but did not have the talent to take it
to the next level. It comes down to the fact that talent by itself can be
wasted without practice, work ethic, and desire, but at the same time desire,
practice, and work ethic are all pretty useless without some natural talent.
While most professional athletes do have a very good work ethic, it’s their
natural talent that got them to the point where they are at the top of their
game. The variables are obvious
and definitely plentiful in this case scenario, but we know that every person
is different. Some people take longer to learn whereas others pick up on it
right away. So how can we ever truly know what it takes to become a
professional golfer?
The opposing views of the “natural talent” argument
states; it is just an excuse for those that lack drive, motivation, mental
fortitude, dedication and the ability to sacrifice. All of these things can be
learned and for many professional athletes are learned at an early age so it
appears to be "natural ability." No one can hit a fast ball out of
the womb or drive a ball 300 yards just because they exist. Playing golf your
whole life and logging 10k hours practicing, experimenting and learning without
distraction are completely different. Especially for those who played their
entire life considering it a recreational activity or just doing what they
think should be done by never bothering to learn or experiment. If you read any
story about a top performer or even a pro that sits on the bench, they have
spent the majority of their life honing their skill because it brought them
great pleasure to compete or play.
Many have
also said it came at the expense of a "normal" childhood. But that is
sacrifice for you have to make. The people who call themselves optimist can’t
help but boast with the feeling that in sports anyone or almost anyone can become pro, if they have proper
training. It is obvious that if you started golfing at 4 years old, and kept on
practicing, by the time you're 15 years old you will have more experience than
another 15 year old that just started. So after all is said and done the
controversy prevails as it will for a long time to come. The one thing both
sides are most consistent in agreement with is that golf is a game that cannot
be mastered. Perhaps by agreeing that even Tiger Woods will never master the
game, most golfers can continue to love and cherish the many great names that
have made the sport what it is today.